Banner

Negotiator says gambling bill could face legislature

Casinos.jpg

By Cat Viglienzoni - July 23, 2010

As the impasse continues between the Massachusetts House and Senate over the extent of gambling in the state, a top negotiator says the bill could still get done before the end of the month. But time is ticking on the bill as the legislative session draws to a close at the end of the month.

The bill must be completed and voted on in both branches before the legislative session ends at midnight on July 31. If it is not, it will have to wait until the next session for passage. Points of debate include whether to have slots at racetracks and how many resort-style casinos to allow.

Senate president pro tem and chair of the conference committee on the gambling bill Stan Rosenberg said in an interview with WERS News they are still in the negotiation stage.

"Proposals have been exchanged for the last several hours back and forth. We had an excellent discussion this morning, leaving everyone feeling very optimistic as we left the meeting," he said.

He said he talked to the house chairman for several hours Thursday night and for an hour and a half this morning with the whole conference committee. Though Rosenberg said he cannot divulge the content until it's complete and the committee members have voted, he said he hopes they can maximize jobs and revenue in whatever they do.

"We're hoping that we'll put in place a structure that will allow for the development of a very robust and secure gaming market in Massachusetts that will be able to compete effectively against places like Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun," he said.

Rosenberg said the gambling bill would produce about 15,000 jobs and $350 million in state revenue, as well as bring Massachusetts players who are spending a billion dollars out-of-state in Rhode Island, Connecticut and New York back into the state.

But opponents of the bill hope the stalling means the bill won't make it into the legislature before the end of the session. They say the bill to bring gaming to the state will also bring hidden economic and social costs. Others say the continued focus on the gambling bill detracts from other issues that must try to face a vote before the end of the month, such as health-care cost reform, an economic development stimulus bill and criminal record reform. A group of senators against gambling met with some of Governor Deval Patrick's aides to make the case that special interests are shaping the gambling debate.

The governor opposes slots at racetracks but has said his disapproval isn't serious enough to threaten the legislature with a veto yet. The governor and others who oppose slots at racetracks say they don't lead to bid contracts and they will not bring as much economic development benefit to the state. The governor has also expressed concern that the gambling debate is taking up too much of the legislature's time.

(Photo courtesy: AP Images)